“The Crusades were a religious war the Pope authorized — why make excuses?”

🔥The question: “Jesus said to love your enemies, and yet people were killed in the name of the Church.”

🕯️First, the admission: The Crusades were not one era, one region, or one cause, but in the course of them Christians carrying the Church's emblem committed killing, plunder, coercion, massacres of Jews, and attacks on Eastern Christians. These acts were sins against the Gospel, and “everyone was like that back then” does not dispose of them.

🛡️The Church's answer: Historians have to look concretely at the warfare of the time, the safety of pilgrims, political power, and the defensive situation. But context does not remove moral responsibility. Christians have to learn how dangerous religious zeal becomes when it makes an enemy less than human, and in today's wars and hatreds choose the protection of civilians, religious freedom, and reconciliation.

🧐If they press further: “So was everyone who went on crusade an evil person?” — Motives and responsibility differed from person to person, and we cannot pass judgment on every soul. Even so, there is no avoiding the verdict that particular massacres and lootings were evil. Admitting that individuals were complicated is not the same as blurring the wrongness of the acts.

✨In one sentence: “We can study the complicated background of the Crusades, but we have to say plainly that the massacres, plunder, and coercion carried out in the Church's name were wrongs against the Gospel.”

📚Deep reading — The Crusades and the medieval Inquisition — what actually happened? 10 questions