Miracles and discernment · Question 1
Do Catholics believe anything strange that happens is a miracle?

The question: “If an illness clearing up by chance is a miracle and a dream coming true is a miracle, isn't everything a miracle?”
The Church's answer: No. Something astonishing, or not yet explained, is not the same as a miracle the Church has recognized. The Church spends a long time looking at the facts, at natural explanations, at the reliability of the testimony, at interests like money and reputation, and at the fruit in faith the event bears. With a cure especially, medical experts first review the diagnosis and its course, the effect of treatment, and the possibility of relapse. Before an investigation, the accurate word is not “miracle” but an alleged or reported event.
What the Church has actually recognized: The consolation or the astonishing experience one person received can be precious, but that by itself doesn't become an official judgment of the Church.
An analogy — no stamp on a rumor
If word goes around the schoolyard that someone “picked up a meteorite,” the teacher doesn't stick a museum label on it right away. You check the photo and the place and ask an expert. Investigating a miracle isn't about getting rid of the wonder either; it's a process of separating fact from interpretation.
If they press further: “So do you start from an attitude of not believing in miracles?” — Neither flat denial nor automatic belief. We don't rush the judgment; we look at the evidence and the meaning for faith together.
In one sentence: “An astonishing event and an officially recognized miracle are different. The Church investigates the facts and the natural explanations strictly first.”